Approximately 59 days at the dealership across two extended service periods.
Unfortunately, to date, problems remain unresolved.
Selected thumbnails from the photo and video record I accumulated while documenting the vehicle. Individual examples appear below.
These are individual examples from the record, including electrical-system warnings and later malfunction alerts.
AT WHAT POINT DOES A REPEATED TECHNICAL PROBLEM BECOME A CUSTOMER-TRUST PROBLEM?
WHAT SHOULD “PREMIUM CUSTOMER CARE” LOOK LIKE AFTER FIVE MONTHS OF THIS?
“Electrical system temporarily limited.” “Reduced performance.” By April 13, I had reported a third occurrence in approximately three weeks.
The next day, I wrote that I had “almost had an accident on the highway.” I reported that driver-assistance functionality and one-pedal driving became unavailable as traffic slowed, requiring an avoidance manoeuvre.
The EX90 entered the dealership at 6,009 km. Diagnostics, technical escalation, software work and repeated road testing followed.
I reported that the problems had returned and were occurring on “almost every trip,” including unavailable adaptive cruise control, parking assistance and one-pedal driving.
The vehicle returned for a second extended service period. The investigation involved Volvo technical resources and further software interventions and testing.
Headlight, parking-assistance, parking-sensor and tire-pressure monitoring faults were documented, along with repeated warning-chime behaviour.
When does another repair stop being the answer?
I was informed by the dealership that my EX90 received Volvo's upgraded core computer. Volvo describes the 2025 EX90 upgrade as a hardware-and-software change using dual NVIDIA DRIVE AGX Orin. I am not suggesting Volvo promised that upgrade would correct every issue my vehicle experienced. The narrower point is that I continued documenting faults afterward.
Some of the earlier and more serious symptoms improved. That fact belongs here. But after the core-computer upgrade, I continued documenting additional faults.
This video captures repeated warning chimes continuing without a corresponding problem message visible on the display. It is presented here as recorded — not as a diagnosis of the cause.
These are source documents from my file. Personal contact information and the full VIN have been redacted; the underlying documents have not otherwise been altered.
The dealer purchase sheet identifies the vehicle as a 2025 Volvo EX90 Ultra and shows a sale price of $117,750.
VIEW DOCUMENT → Service · May 5–June 5Opened May 5 at 6,009 km. The record documents battery checks, connector measurements, software intervention and repeated road tests.31 days of diagnostics and testing.
VIEW PAGE 1 → Service · June 5After the extended diagnostic period, the service record says the vehicle was released back to the customer.
VIEW PAGE 2 → Service · June 26–July 24The second extended service period followed the recurrence of the problems. The July printout lists further software work after the vehicle came back.
VIEW PAGE 1 → Service · June 26–July 24The technician narrative says the vehicle “came back” after the same problem recurred. The case was reopened, additional updates were performed and the vehicle was road-tested again.
VIEW PAGE 2 → Correspondence · July 15My follow-up referenced Volvo Canada and the engineering team in Sweden. Hours later, the dealer reported that Volvo had supplied a special software update and planned a second.
VIEW EMAIL EXCERPT →The dates of the two extended service periods are supported by the service record together with contemporaneous correspondence. The July printout retains the original May 5 open date for BT 327339 and notes that the vehicle “came back” after the same problem recurred.
In 2025, another Montréal-area EX90 owner created MyVolvoEX90.com to document his own experience. His vehicle, chronology and dispute were separate from mine. Months later, after my own experience, I reached the same unusual decision: make the record public.
View the archived MyVolvoEX90.com site on the Wayback Machine ↗
That coincidence isn't proof.
But surely it raises a question worth examining:
Are these isolated experiences — or signs of broader safety and reliability issues?
Before MyVolvoEX90Too, another Montréal-area EX90 owner made his own experience public. His case drew automotive-media attention. Separately, major publications have documented problems with EX90 vehicles they tested or owned.
Coverage of the separate Canadian owner's decision to publicly catalogue problems with his vehicle.
Read independent coverage ↗Québec coverage of the first owner's experience and the website he created to document it.
Lire l'article ↗CR reported warning lights, charging trouble, screen and audio failures, resets and two dealer visits within its first 1,000 miles.
Read the report ↗MotorTrend reported early faults in its newer dual-Orin EX90, including an AC-charging failure that required dealer repair.
Read the report ↗Different vehicles. Different owners. Different circumstances. The purpose of this section is to show what independent publications have documented.
The record stays separated.Read the record.
Then decide for yourself.
“I just wanted to follow up regarding my EX90 case. Since providing the requested information to Volvo last week, I haven’t received any updates and was wondering if you had heard back from either Volvo Canada or the engineering team in Sweden.”
“According to Volvo, the issue with your vehicle is software-related. They have provided us with a special software update to load into your vehicle. They have also requested that we keep the car until the end of the week, as they plan to send a second software update this Friday.”
